TruePath

Dog walking

Are Dog Walking Apps Safe? What Owners Should Actually Check

Dog walking apps range from rigorously verified to essentially unscreened marketplaces. Here's what 'safe' actually means, what to check on any platform, and how the major Australian apps compare.

By atticus · 7 min read · Last updated 17 May 2026

Dog walking apps are as safe as their verification processes — and those vary enormously. Calling something an "app" says nothing about what checks the platform has done on the person who will be alone with your dog and inside your home. Here's what to actually evaluate.

The two types of safety to evaluate

Safety for your dog. Does the walker have the skills to handle an emergency? Are they insured if your dog is injured or injures someone? Is GPS tracking on so there's a location record if something goes wrong? Does the platform have a protocol for incident response?

Safety for your home. The walker has your key and knows your home's layout. What background checks have been run? Are those checks disclosed or just implied? Does the platform hold any record of who entered your property?

A platform that focuses only on the first — "we care about dog welfare!" — without addressing the second is leaving a gap that matters. And a platform that implies the second ("verified walkers!") without being specific about what "verified" actually means is worth pressing.

What verification actually means — and doesn't

The word "verified" appears on almost every dog walking platform. It means almost nothing without specifics.

Online identity check. The applicant uploads a government ID document and the platform confirms it's a real document and that the person exists. This tells you the walker is who they say they are. It tells you nothing about their criminal history, their reference quality, or their actual animal handling ability.

Police/background check. In Australia, this means a National Police Check through an ACIC-accredited provider. This reveals disclosable court outcomes — convictions, pending charges. It does not reveal non-conviction information or records that have been spent under relevant state legislation.

References. Self-reported references (the applicant provides names and contact details) are nearly useless — of course they're going to give you contacts who will say good things. References that the platform calls directly are meaningfully different.

In-person interview. No platform at national scale other than TruePath conducts an in-person assessment of every walker. This is the hardest step to scale — it's also the most predictive of actual quality.

Platform comparison

FeatureTruePathMad PawsPawshake
Background check typeNational Police Check (ACIC)Online identity checkOnline identity check
ReferencesCalled directly by TruePathSelf-reported by applicantSelf-reported by applicant
In-person interviewYes — every walkerNoNo
GPS trackingEvery walk, built-inVaries by sitterVaries by sitter
Platform liability insuranceYes — all walksPremium Care (claim-based)Third-party liability (claim-based)
Emergency vet coverYes — walk-related injuriesVia Premium Care claimVia policy claim
Live location trackingYes — real-time in appVariesVaries
Walker count (AU)Hundreds (curated)Tens of thousandsThousands
Safety feature comparison, May 2026. Based on published platform policies and direct verification.

The verification depth trade-off

Mad Paws has more walkers than TruePath. That's a fact, and it's worth acknowledging honestly. In some suburbs — particularly regional areas — Mad Paws will have a walker available where TruePath doesn't yet. If you need a walker in regional Queensland, Mad Paws is the practical choice.

The trade-off: more walkers means a lower verification bar. Mad Paws' online identity check plus self-reported references is a faster process than TruePath's three-gate system (police check, references called, in-person interview). That speed comes at the cost of depth.

For an owner in inner Sydney, Melbourne, or Brisbane where TruePath operates, the choice is between a thoroughly verified pool of hundreds and a loosely verified pool of thousands. Most owners, once they understand the distinction, prefer depth.

What GPS tracking changes about safety

A platform that includes GPS tracking on every walk creates a form of accountability that changes how walkers approach their work. The walk duration is recorded. The route is visible. A short walk is documented as a short walk.

Without GPS, an owner who books a 30-minute walk has no way to verify it happened at all, let alone that it lasted 30 minutes. This isn't an indictment of all walkers — the majority are honest. But the accountability structure exists because it matters when the minority isn't.

Beyond accountability: GPS provides the last-known location in an emergency. If a dog escapes mid-walk in an unfamiliar area, the GPS record narrows the search to the most recent position. That data point has aided genuine dog recovery incidents.

Red flags on any platform

  • "Verified" without specifics. If the platform won't say what their verification process includes, assume it's minimal.
  • No GPS tracking by default. If tracking depends on the individual walker's choice, it's not a safety feature — it's optional.
  • Insurance that requires the owner to claim. Automatic coverage is meaningfully different from claim-based coverage. Know which one you have before you need it.
  • Unlimited group walk sizes. No cap on dogs per walker means no meaningful supervision.
  • No cancellation or no-show policy. A platform with no written policy on what happens when a walker doesn't show tells you how much accountability structure exists.

Find a TruePath walker near you

Background-checked walkers, GPS-tracked walks, and live photo updates. Most owners book their first walk within an hour.

Find a walker

Frequently asked questions

Keep reading