Best Apps to Be a Dog Walker in Australia (2026) — Ranked for Walkers

The best dog walking app for walkers in Australia depends on what you're optimising for: maximum take-home pay, fast access to your first clients, international exposure, or a combination. This article ranks TruePath, Mad Paws, Pawshake, and Rover from the walker's perspective — not the owner's — with an honest look at where each platform falls short.

How to read this comparison

Every platform has a different fee model, so "commission" isn't always the same thing. Some platforms take a percentage from the sitter's listed price. Others charge a separate service fee to the owner and let the sitter keep their full listed rate. The distinction matters for your pricing strategy — but what ultimately matters is how much lands in your account per booking.

The figures below are based on publicly available platform information as of 2026. Commission structures do change — always verify current rates directly with each platform.

Feature	TruePath	Mad Paws	Pawshake	Rover
Commission model	Platform takes commission from walker earnings	Service fee charged to owner; sitter keeps listed rate	~19% from sitter earnings	~20% from sitter earnings
Commission rate	Lowest of four platforms	Low (sitter-side)	~19%	~20%
Australia-specific	✓	✓	—	—
Client base (AU)	Growing	Largest in AU	Moderate	Small in AU
Onboarding difficulty	High (3-step)	Low–moderate	Low	Low
Police check required	✓	—	—	—
Verification shown to clients	✓	—	—	—
GPS tracking on walks	✓	—	—	—
Platform insurance	✓	✓	✓	✓
Payment timing	After service completion	After service completion	After service completion	After service completion
International bookings	—	—	✓	✓

TruePath — best for take-home pay and trust signals

TruePath is the newest of the four platforms and the only one designed exclusively for the Australian market. From a walker's perspective, there are two things that distinguish it: the commission rate and the verification process.

Commission: TruePath takes the lowest commission of the four platforms. If you're doing high walk volume, the difference compounds quickly. A walker completing 20 walks per week at $32/walk will take home meaningfully more per year on TruePath than on Pawshake or Rover.

Verification as a trust signal: TruePath's 3-step process — ACIC National Police Check, direct reference calls, and an in-person interview — is significantly more rigorous than any other platform on this list. Only 65% of applicants are approved. For walkers who get through, that's not just gatekeeping — it's a credential you can show clients. Owners who choose TruePath often do so specifically because of the verification standard. That means the clientele tends to be more engaged, more loyal, and more willing to book regularly.

GPS tracking: All walks are GPS-tracked and reports are shared with owners. This creates accountability but also provides proof of service quality, which supports repeat bookings and referrals.

Honest limitation: TruePath's client base is smaller than Mad Paws. If you're in a suburb with a thin client density, building your first 3–5 reviews may take longer than it would on Mad Paws. This improves as the platform grows, but it's worth knowing.

Best for: Experienced walkers who want higher margins, are willing to go through a rigorous application, and are in a suburb with solid pet ownership density.

Mad Paws — best for getting started quickly

Mad Paws is Australia's largest pet services marketplace by active bookings. For a new walker trying to build their first reviews, that volume matters. There are more owners searching for walkers on Mad Paws than on any other Australian platform, which means faster access to early bookings.

Fee model: Mad Paws charges a service fee to the owner rather than taking a cut of the sitter's listed price. This means you keep your listed rate. The platform takes its revenue from owners via a separate fee. The practical implication: your listed price is your take-home price (minus tax), which simplifies your pricing.

Onboarding: Mad Paws is the easiest of the four to get onto. There's no police check requirement and no in-person interview. Identity verification is lighter-touch. This makes it faster to start, but it also means less differentiation between you and other walkers on the platform — everyone looks roughly the same to a new client.

Honest limitation: The ease of onboarding cuts both ways. Without a police check requirement, owners who care about safety can't verify walker quality through the platform itself. You'll need to build trust through reviews alone, which takes time.

Best for: New walkers who need early bookings and reviews to build momentum, and experienced walkers who want to supplement their TruePath income with additional volume.

Pawshake — best for international bookings

Pawshake operates in 25+ countries and has a strong presence among international travellers and expats who want a sitter they can find both at home and abroad. For an Australian walker who travels regularly and wants to sit dogs internationally, Pawshake's global network is a genuine advantage.

Commission: At ~19%, Pawshake takes the second-highest commission of the four platforms. Experienced Pawshake sitters typically price higher to absorb this — listing at $95 for a service they'd list at $80 elsewhere. This works reasonably well in premium urban markets but can make you uncompetitive in price-sensitive outer suburbs.

Onboarding: Easy. Identity verification, no police check requirement. You can be live within a day.

Honest limitation: In Australia specifically, Pawshake's client density is lower than Mad Paws in most suburbs. The platform earns more trust among internationally mobile clients than among local families seeking a regular neighbourhood walker. The commission rate is harder to justify if you're not using the global reach.

Best for: Walkers who travel and want to sit dogs in multiple countries, or those in tourist-heavy urban areas where internationally mobile clients are common.

Rover — best for US brand recognition

Rover is the world's largest pet services platform by booking volume — but most of that volume is in the United States. In Australia, Rover's market presence is significantly smaller than Mad Paws, and the platform doesn't have the local depth that Australian owners and walkers benefit from.

Commission: ~20% from sitter earnings. The highest of the four platforms.

Honest limitation: For an Australian walker, Rover's global scale doesn't translate to more Australian clients. You'll be competing on a platform with a smaller local client pool and paying the highest commission rate. The main reason to consider Rover is if you spend significant time in the US or want US clients for holiday sitting when travelling.

Best for: Walkers who frequently travel to the US, or those who want to build an international sitter profile across both Rover and Pawshake.

Which platforms should you be on?

Most full-time Australian dog walkers operate on two platforms simultaneously. The recommended starting point:

TruePath + Mad Paws is the most common pairing among experienced Australian walkers. TruePath provides the best per-walk earnings and a strong client quality signal; Mad Paws provides the volume needed to build reviews quickly and fill gaps in your schedule.

Once you have 15+ reviews across both platforms and consistent bookings, you can assess whether adding Pawshake or Rover makes sense for your specific situation.

A note on platform loyalty

Platforms prefer you to use them exclusively, but nothing prevents you from listing on multiple services. Your income stability as a self-employed walker depends on not being dependent on a single platform's algorithm or policy changes. Diversifying across two or three platforms is a sensible business decision.

That said, once TruePath verification is on your profile, it carries credibility that you can reference when communicating with clients on any platform — your police check and interview status are yours, regardless of where you're meeting the client.

Platform features that actually affect your work

Beyond commission and client volume, some day-to-day platform features matter more than they first appear:

GPS tracking (TruePath): TruePath tracks every walk and generates an automated report for the owner — route, duration, any notes. This sounds like a compliance tool, but it's actually a client retention tool. Owners who receive a walk report with a map after every session are significantly more likely to rebook and refer. It also protects you: if a client ever disputes a walk's length or route, you have documentation.

In-app messaging: All platforms have in-app messaging. Keep all client communication within the platform — this protects you if there's a dispute, and it's required by most platforms' terms.

Review response: TruePath and Mad Paws allow you to respond publicly to reviews. Always respond to negative reviews professionally and briefly — future clients read your responses as much as the review itself. A defensive or dismissive response does more damage than the negative review.

Cancellation management: Understand each platform's cancellation window before accepting bookings you're not sure about. On TruePath, declining a confirmed booking impacts your reliability rating — a metric visible to the platform's matching algorithm. Accept bookings selectively rather than accepting everything and cancelling.

What the verification gap means in practice

The most underappreciated difference between TruePath and its competitors is not the commission rate — it's the verification standard and what it means for the types of clients you attract.

On Mad Paws or Pawshake, any adult can create a walker profile with minimal vetting. Owners who aren't particularly discerning book on those platforms. Owners who care deeply about their pet's safety and want to know their walker has passed a police check and been interviewed in person are the market TruePath specifically appeals to.

For walkers, this self-selection has practical consequences:

• TruePath clients tend to give more detailed briefs about their dog's needs
• They're more likely to be long-term repeat clients rather than one-off bookers
• They're less likely to leave an unreasonable review over a minor issue
• They're more likely to refer friends in their network (who are also discerning owners)

The result is a smaller but higher-quality client base per walker. For walkers who treat this as a business rather than casual work, the quality of TruePath's client pool compounds over time — regular clients, referrals, and a stable income base built on professional relationships.

Want to earn this walking dogs?

TruePath walkers set their own hours and rates. Apply once, pass our verification, and start booking walks in your suburb.

Apply to walk

Keep reading

become a walker

How to Become a Dog Walker in Australia (2026) — The Complete Guide

A step-by-step guide to starting a dog walking business in Australia — from ABN registration and insurance to joining platforms and landing your first clients.

become a walker

Mad Paws vs TruePath — Which Pays Dog Walkers and Sitters More?

A direct earnings comparison for dog walkers: how Mad Paws and TruePath handle fees, what you actually take home per walk, and what 20 walks a week looks like annually on each platform.

become a walker

TruePath Walker and Sitter Requirements — How to Apply and What to Expect

TruePath approves only 65% of applicants. Here's exactly what the 3-step application involves — police check, reference calls, and in-person interview — and how to prepare.